Fijian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,676,035 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.909. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 27.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $43,997, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $52,860, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $91,171, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $56,975, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $52,302, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.69%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (46.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.3%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.3%).