African vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,234,331 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 51.9 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $95,560, a difference of 21.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $102,261, a difference of 20.4%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $39,109, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $51,247, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($41,955 compared to $46,916, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 44.2%), family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.6%), births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.4%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.1%).