Portuguese vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,208,714 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,247, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $95,560, a difference of 4.1%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $85,797, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $61,270, a difference of 0.28%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and per capita income ($44,362 compared to $44,987, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.1%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.010%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 47.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.5%).