Cuban vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,604,194 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $61,270, a difference of 24.7%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $104,282, a difference of 22.7%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $44,987, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $51,247, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $39,109, a difference of 11.9%), and median earnings ($40,619 compared to $46,916, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 73.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 57.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.58%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 29.9%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.9%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.1%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.14%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%).