French vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,595,020 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.5%), per capita income ($43,685 compared to $44,987, a difference of 3.0%), and median household income ($83,468 compared to $85,797, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.030%), median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $55,415, a difference of 0.12%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $46,916, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.1%), single male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.80%), female poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.3%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.1%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.5%).