Immigrants from Africa vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,104,155 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $95,560, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $102,261, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,564 compared to $46,916, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $51,247, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,837 compared to $61,270, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.31%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (62.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.3%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and college, under 1 year (65.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.50%).