Immigrants from Western Europe vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,982,874 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Western Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.961% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Europe corresponds to an increase of 1,961.1 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,065 compared to $44,987, a difference of 11.3%), median male earnings ($60,334 compared to $55,415, a difference of 8.9%), and median family income ($112,688 compared to $104,282, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,957 compared to $51,247, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,933 compared to $61,270, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.4%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.45%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple households (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.9%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and master's degree (17.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.9%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%), male disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.6%).