Slavic vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,582,545 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.981. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.461% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 460.5 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $55,415, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $51,247, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $39,109, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $44,987, a difference of 0.14%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $102,261, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.5%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.43%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.6%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.4%).