Brazilian vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,316,455 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 28.6 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $51,247, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $44,987, a difference of 3.8%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $85,797, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $61,270, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $102,261, a difference of 2.1%), and median family income ($106,942 compared to $104,282, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.60%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.2%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%).