Houma vs Icelander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Icelander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Icelanders
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Icelander Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,138,610 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.601% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 600.7 Icelanders.
Houma vs Icelander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $102,261, a difference of 41.8%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $85,797, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,415, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,247, a difference of 15.5%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,916, a difference of 20.4%).
Income Metric | Houma | Icelander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Excellent $44,987 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Good $104,282 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Good $85,797 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Good $46,916 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Good $55,415 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Fair $39,109 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $51,247 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Good $95,560 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Good $102,261 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Average $61,270 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 27.5% |
Houma vs Icelander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 88.2%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 83.9%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.3%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Icelander |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Houma vs Icelander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 77.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 54.5%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Icelander |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Houma vs Icelander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Icelander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Average 82.8% |
Houma vs Icelander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Icelander |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Excellent 30.3% |
Houma vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Icelander |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Houma vs Icelander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 115.9%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 114.2%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Icelander |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Excellent 39.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Houma vs Icelander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.5%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.5%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Icelander |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.4% |