Immigrants from Russia vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,610,030 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 44.0 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $44,987, a difference of 15.7%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $55,415, a difference of 14.3%), and median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $39,109, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $61,270, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,247, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (63.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 56.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.2%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%).