Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,226,412 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 62.2 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $122,222, a difference of 39.6%), householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $69,872, a difference of 39.5%), and median household income ($75,848 compared to $104,796, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $57,123, a difference of 11.2%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $46,502, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 126.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 38.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 73.7%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 65.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 95.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.6%), cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.3%).