Puerto Rican vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,482,796 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 24.8 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($65,996 compared to $118,056, a difference of 78.9%), median family income ($70,423 compared to $125,150, a difference of 77.7%), and median household income ($59,197 compared to $104,796, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $57,123, a difference of 43.8%), wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 44.6%), and median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $46,502, a difference of 47.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 178.7%), family poverty (20.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 163.3%), and married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 163.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 50.9%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 70.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 81.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 99.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (9.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 82.4%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 71.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 111.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 102.4%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 86.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 111.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 81.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (8.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.2%).