Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Eastern Asia

Poor
Good
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,941
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
99th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Eastern Asia Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,392,973 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.050% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 49.8 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Eastern Asia Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $53,806, a difference of 63.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $118,056, a difference of 54.9%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $125,150, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $57,123, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $69,872, a difference of 24.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$53,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$125,150
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$104,796
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$56,183
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$66,903
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$46,502
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$57,123
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$118,056
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$122,222
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$69,872
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 129.9%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 86.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 21.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
9.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Tragic
32.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
71.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 121.6%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.0%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 6.8%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.22, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
48.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
25.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 108.2%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 105.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
53.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Fair
6.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 130.9%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 120.1%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 113.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Excellent
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
71.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
66.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
48.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
20.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
3.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 60.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.3%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Eastern Asia
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
8.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%