Cuban vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,594,577 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,981 compared to $125,150, a difference of 47.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $118,056, a difference of 44.9%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $53,806, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $57,123, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $46,502, a difference of 33.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 95.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.0%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 57.3%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (67.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 115.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 72.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.8%).