Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,646,090 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 82.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $118,056, a difference of 23.5%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $53,806, a difference of 22.7%), and median household income ($86,073 compared to $104,796, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $57,123, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $69,872, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.56%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 36.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 93.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%).