Belizean vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,382,427 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.241% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to a decrease of 240.9 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,534 compared to $118,056, a difference of 39.7%), median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $66,903, a difference of 38.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $122,222, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $57,123, a difference of 11.8%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $46,502, a difference of 24.2%), and wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 59.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.3%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 47.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 112.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 84.0%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.2%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.1%).