Croatian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 360,435,766 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to a decrease of 27.1 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,685 compared to $104,796, a difference of 15.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,414 compared to $118,056, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($40,993 compared to $46,502, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($63,225 compared to $69,872, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $57,123, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.53%), currently married (48.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 64.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 50.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.2%).