Fijian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,949,517 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $118,056, a difference of 47.6%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $66,903, a difference of 46.7%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $53,806, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,123, a difference of 14.0%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,872, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 46.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 26.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (46.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 162.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 124.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 102.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 16.7%).