Portuguese vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 424,257,651 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 32.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $53,806, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $118,056, a difference of 18.7%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $66,903, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $57,123, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $69,872, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 58.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 69.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 58.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.0%).