Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,574,344 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.736. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.607% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 607.4 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $118,056, a difference of 29.5%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $125,150, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $122,222, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $57,123, a difference of 9.2%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $46,502, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 35.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 75.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.63%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.8%).