Ugandan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,413,940 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 90.6 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $118,056, a difference of 22.1%), median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $66,903, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $104,796, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $57,123, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $46,502, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.5%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 55.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.1%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.5%).