Israeli vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,597,381 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.394% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 394.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,579 compared to $118,056, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $57,123, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($96,552 compared to $104,796, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($52,596 compared to $53,806, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $69,872, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 14.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (63.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%).