Liberian vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,475,245 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 91.5 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $118,056, a difference of 44.0%), per capita income ($38,780 compared to $53,806, a difference of 38.8%), and median household income ($75,667 compared to $104,796, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $57,123, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $46,502, a difference of 21.7%), and wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 58.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 69.5%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.84%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%), no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 94.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 84.9%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.6%).