Immigrants vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,913,422 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to an increase of 85.3 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $53,806, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $118,056, a difference of 25.0%), and median family income ($100,962 compared to $125,150, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $57,123, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $69,872, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.3%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.3%).