Spanish vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,182,788 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Spanish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,200 compared to $118,056, a difference of 28.0%), per capita income ($42,249 compared to $53,806, a difference of 27.4%), and median household income ($83,343 compared to $104,796, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.29%), householder income under 25 years ($50,813 compared to $57,123, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,795 compared to $69,872, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 36.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.070%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 71.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (94.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.1%).