Immigrants from Canada vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,313,803 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 27.5%), per capita income ($49,412 compared to $42,164, a difference of 17.2%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $52,810, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $40,429, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $46,440, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.5%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 88.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 56.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%).