Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nepal

Ghanaians

Good
Fair
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,626,824 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to an increase of 38.2 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.4%), median family income ($104,966 compared to $98,877, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,322 compared to $90,137, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $52,594, a difference of 0.030%), median female earnings ($40,704 compared to $40,429, a difference of 0.68%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $60,043, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,187
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Good
$104,966
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Good
$87,046
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,925
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,615
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,704
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,611
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,322
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,190
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,843
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (62.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 56.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.7%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.5%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.7%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NepalGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%