Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Ghanaians

Poor
Fair
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,735,582 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $60,043, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $97,277, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $90,137, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($41,709 compared to $42,164, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $40,429, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.6%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (43.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 56.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 12.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 30.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.25%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%