Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,907,136 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Dominican Republic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominican Republic within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominican Republic corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($45,758 compared to $60,043, a difference of 31.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,836 compared to $97,277, a difference of 23.4%), and median family income ($81,233 compared to $98,877, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,204 compared to $52,594, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($36,857 compared to $40,429, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and married-couple family poverty (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and single male poverty (14.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.2% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple households (37.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (31.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 91.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (68.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (33.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 44.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.9%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).