Russian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,084,767 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 10.5 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $42,164, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $90,137, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $52,594, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $40,429, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $60,043, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.7%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.5%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.3%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%).