Immigrants from Uruguay vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,416,845 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 33.7 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $60,043, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $42,164, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $52,810, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,594, a difference of 0.56%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $98,877, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.8%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (63.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 37.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and high school diploma (87.6% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%).