Burmese vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,666,340 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $90,137, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $97,277, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $52,594, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,429, a difference of 11.1%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $46,440, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 61.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.4%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 70.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.3%).