Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Ghanaian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Ghanaians
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ghanaian Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,379,712 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 65.6 Ghanaians.
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.7%), per capita income ($49,448 compared to $42,164, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $90,137, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $40,429, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $60,043, a difference of 8.6%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Poor $42,164 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Poor $98,877 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Fair $83,582 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Average $46,440 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Poor $52,810 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Excellent $40,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Good $52,594 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Tragic $90,137 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Poor $97,277 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Fair $60,043 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.8%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Good 83.0% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.4%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.91%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Tragic 34.3% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 95.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 21.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 83.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 78.0%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 1.8% |
Lithuanian vs Ghanaian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.45%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.76%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Ghanaian |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Poor 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Average 2.5% |