Lumbee vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,085,447 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 9.3 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $47,012, a difference of 35.9%), householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $49,234, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $71,337, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $42,434, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $38,707, a difference of 5.0%), and per capita income ($29,845 compared to $31,729, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 70.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (33.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and male poverty (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 266.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 263.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 196.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (39.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.9%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.6%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 99.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Crow communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.1%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and female disability (15.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.3%).