Lumbee vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,323,675 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $42,380, a difference of 22.5%), householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $47,722, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $66,529, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($36,876 compared to $36,999, a difference of 0.33%), median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $42,098, a difference of 0.92%), and median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $33,046, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and family poverty (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (25.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty among girls under 16 (30.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and female poverty (23.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.8%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.65, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (39.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (39.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.93%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.7%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and professional degree (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (32.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%).