Lumbee vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,525,679 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 177.8 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $85,054, a difference of 55.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $92,876, a difference of 54.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $100,141, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.9%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $39,186, a difference of 20.6%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $45,928, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 100.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 94.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 48.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 71.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 44.5%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 78.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 64.5%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.5%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.3%).