Lumbee vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,607,006 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 59.6 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $51,022, a difference of 47.5%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $74,217, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $80,012, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $33,953, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $39,762, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $45,538, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 82.9%), single father poverty (28.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 77.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 55.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 28.7%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.49, a difference of 5.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 138.7%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and bachelor's degree (24.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (54.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.41%), college, 1 year or more (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 48.5%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 11.3%).