Lumbee vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,156,988 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 19.3 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $94,622, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $102,123, a difference of 56.8%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $85,101, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $38,397, a difference of 18.1%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $46,463, a difference of 26.0%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $55,793, a difference of 33.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 132.1%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 113.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 109.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 43.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.9%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 70.2%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 58.1%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 51.9%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 52.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 85.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 82.0%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.7%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.0%).