Lumbee vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,664,516 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.119% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 119.0 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $65,874, a difference of 62.5%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $50,627, a difference of 46.4%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $78,930, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $36,459, a difference of 12.2%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $41,969, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 84.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 77.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 34.7%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 41.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 76.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.5%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.38, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 52.4%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.29%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.8%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.9%).