Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,885,792 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 22.2 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $85,101, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $55,793, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $94,622, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.66%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $61,735, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $50,554, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.9%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.98%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 28.6%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.0%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.41%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%).