Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,999,620 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $73,509, a difference of 44.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $86,595, a difference of 43.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $81,531, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $48,603, a difference of 19.0%), and median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $35,864, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 64.6%), receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 20.5%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 53.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.50%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.6%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.8%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 71.4%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.1%).