Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,853,524 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $51,389, a difference of 34.2%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $39,826, a difference of 32.2%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $44,206, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $54,610, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $65,427, a difference of 7.1%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (30.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (66.4% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 84.9%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 80.5%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.3%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and male disability (9.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%).