Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Chickasaw
10.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,069,639 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 49.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.44% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 22.2% | 67.9% |
Range | 21.8% | 63.9% |
Mean | 10.2% | 25.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Taiwanese (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |