Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,871,795 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $51,473, a difference of 34.0%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $39,870, a difference of 32.1%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $97,288, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $52,365, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $38,528, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $57,919, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 5.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.2%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 42.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.1%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 73.1%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.4%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.6%).