Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Exceptional
Fair
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,044,381 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $50,298, a difference of 37.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $91,385, a difference of 35.9%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $78,682, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $48,749, a difference of 18.6%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $38,028, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $57,114, a difference of 22.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 54.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 54.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.2%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.4%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.5%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%