Ethiopian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,297,826 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 31.6%), median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $61,228, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $105,223, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $65,209, a difference of 0.34%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.50%), and median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $42,108, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.9%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 68.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and high school diploma (89.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.9% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.070%), associate's degree (50.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.8%).