Celtic vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Lithuanians

Average
Excellent
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,793,947 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 205.3 Lithuanians.
Celtic Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Celtic vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($101,139 compared to $115,395, a difference of 14.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $105,223, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $112,484, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $53,552, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $65,209, a difference of 7.6%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricCelticLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
28.7%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticLithuanian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticLithuanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.28%), and family households (63.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
29.6%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Average
6.3%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.6%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Celtic vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Celtic vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricCelticLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%