Cherokee vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,758,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,448, a difference of 32.9%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $115,395, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $112,484, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $53,552, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $65,209, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 13.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 63.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 56.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.0%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.5%).