Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Lithuanians

Average
Excellent
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,039,906 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 45.2 Lithuanians.
Tsimshian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $61,228, a difference of 25.4%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $49,448, a difference of 22.6%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $53,552, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $42,108, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $105,223, a difference of 7.6%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricTsimshianLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
28.7%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.55%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 156.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 75.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianLithuanian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
29.6%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Average
6.3%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 69.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and 6th grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%).
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%